Grain Shippers Disappointed in Government Decision on CGC Surplus

CGC announcement contains no mention of reducing fees to industry/farmers


WINNIPEG, Manitoba, Aug. 02, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Western Grain Elevators Association (WGEA) is disappointed by the decision of the federal government to keep an excessive overpayment of fees which were generated from a mandated government process.  Over the course of five years the CGC systematically overcharged the industry, including farmers, by $130 million, and with this announcement the government is signaling that it has no intention of returning any of the overpayment.  In addition, it is with certainty these expenditures will cause a further fee increase in the following five year budget cycle due to what will become an ongoing commitment to maintain these new and expanded programs.

“The fees instituted by the CGC were never collected for the purposes outlined in its release of August 1, 2018, nor does the User Fees Act permit the overtaxing of users,” said Wade Sobkowich, Executive Director of the WGEA.  “The CGC has found itself in a surplus position due to increased production by farmers, and handlers’ ability to market grain through the system.  These amounts were charged to farmers and exporters, and should rightly be returned to the grain sector through a future fee reduction.” 

In its May 2017 submission to the CGC, the WGEA said the most logical and responsible course of action would be to return the overcharges to farmers by reducing the CGC’s prescribed user fees for a fixed period of time, since the CGC is unable to return the money through other means.  The $130 million surplus was generated by unnecessarily high user fees, and the WGEA along with many other grain related associations asked the CGC to find a way to compensate the value chain for collecting too much money.

Furthermore, in May 2018, the federal government created six Economic Strategy Tables to drive innovation and growth in Canada’s priority sectors including Agri-Food.  Input from the agricultural sector included significant reduction in the CGC’s presence to allow Canada to compete on a level footing with other exporting nations, both financially and from a regulatory standpoint.   “The CGC announcement pre-supposes what the Agri-Food Table will conclude and runs counter to recommendations for reform,” continued Sobkowich.  “What is the point of asking for input from the value chain if the government is going to make a multi-million dollar announcement ahead of the outcome, with the industry’s own money no less?”  The WGEA is of the strong view that the CGC must step away from providing commercial services and limit itself to the role of regulator.

User fees are collected by governments to offset costs for government services that are of a direct and focused benefit to the private sector.  The WGEA contends that not only did the CGC overcharge for its services, but it has also been applying these fees to offset the cost of government services that are of a general public benefit.  “One-third of the costs in the U.S. and approximately 40% of costs in Australia are covered by their governments for similar services,” said Sobkowich.  “Not only does the CGC operate in a near 100% cost recovery model, but now it has overcharged by $130 million and has no plan to return it.”

The WGEA is an association of grain businesses operating in Canada which collectively handle in excess of 90% of western Canada’s bulk grain exports. This group of companies represents the single largest user of the services of the Canadian Grain Commission.  They, and the farmers and customers they serve, have a vital interest in ensuring that CGC’s services and fees are properly established.


Contact Data