Contact Information: Contact: Kimberly Brooks King & Spalding Ph. 212-827-4378
King & Spalding Earns Victory in Mass Toxic Tort Case for Cooper Industries
| Source: King & Spalding
HOUSTON, TX--(Marketwire - February 8, 2008) - King & Spalding, a leading international law
firm, earned a major victory for its client Cooper Industries in a mass
toxic tort case. On February 5, 2008, the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Kentucky granted summary judgment against four
bellwether plaintiffs in the case and in doing so enforced a high benchmark
for plaintiffs attempting to show injury from exposure to chemicals.
Plaintiffs contended that general evidence of contamination in the area,
combined with alleged evidence of elevated chemicals in the plaintiffs'
blood, was sufficient to show causation. The court disagreed and found
that such generalized evidence was insufficient to prove causation.
Rather, plaintiffs were required to offer specific, quantified evidence of
dose and exposure levels in order to prove causation. The court's ruling
has important implications for the remaining plaintiffs as they must now
demonstrate scientifically reliable evidence of specific causation to avoid
dismissal of their actions.
The litigation centers on the National Electric Coil (NEC) plant, a former
Cooper facility in Harlan, Kentucky. In February 1989, Kentucky officials
discovered that the groundwater wells adjacent to the plant were
contaminated with various chemicals. Eventually, the site was designated as
a Superfund site by the U.S. Environment Protection Agency, and thousands
of local residents brought suit against Cooper claiming that the
contamination had caused cancer and other serious diseases. In late 2006,
the court ruled that a group of four bellwether plaintiffs could proceed to
trial.
King & Spalding lawyers, working with co-counsel, presented extensive
Daubert motions, attacking plaintiffs' specific causation experts for
relying on qualitative evidence of contamination in the area rather than
performing a quantitative dose/response calculation to support the
contention that plaintiffs' exposure to chemicals from the NEC facility was
sufficient to cause injury. The court granted both this motion as well as
Cooper's motion for summary judgment.
The King & Spalding team representing Cooper Industries was led by partners
Bobby Meadows and Tracie Renfroe, who were assisted by partners Cynthia
Stroman and Brannon Robertson and counsel Jonathan Marsh.
About King & Spalding
King & Spalding is an international law firm with more than 800 lawyers in
Atlanta, Charlotte, Dubai, Frankfurt, Houston, London, New York, Riyadh
(affiliated office) and Washington, D.C. The firm represents half of the
Fortune 100 and in a Corporate Counsel survey in September 2007 was among
the top firms representing Fortune 250 companies. For additional
information, visit www.kslaw.com.