The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Steel Dynamics, Inc.


NEW YORK, March 20, 2009 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. announces that a lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana on behalf of common stock purchasers of Steel Dynamics, Inc. ("STLD" or the "Company") (Nasdaq:STLD) between January 26, 2009 and March 11, 2009, inclusive (the "Class Period"), for violations of the federal securities laws.

No class has yet been certified in the above action. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If you purchased STLD common stock during the Class Period, and wish to move the court for appointment of lead plaintiff, you must do so with 60 days from March 16, 2009. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff will be selected from among applicants claiming the largest loss from investment in the Company during the Class Period. You do not need to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff in order to share in any recovery.

To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Sue Lee at The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C. 29 Broadway, Suite 2400, New York, New York 10006, by telephone toll free at (877) 495-1187 or (212) 952-0602, by email to slee@brualdilawfirm.com or visit our website at http://www.brualdilawfirm.com.

The complaint charges STLD and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the federal securities laws by making false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business and financial results. Defendants failed to disclose that: a) demand for STLD's products showed continuing weakness in Q1 2009; b) STLD's inventories in its Flat Roll Division were at excessive levels and were materially impaired by approximately $70 million; c) given the continuing weakness in demand for STLD's products in Q1 2009, and in the absence of any existing facts to indicate or exhibit a reversal in that adverse trend, as well as the impaired value of inventories in STLD's Flat Roll Division, defendants lacked a reasonable basis in fact for their earnings guidance for Q1 2009; and d) Defendant Bates engaged in unusual insider selling and realized proceeds of in excess of $30 million.

When defendants disclosed the truth to the market on March 11, 2009, the price of STLD's common stocked dropped 15% to close at $7.25, on volume of more than 33 million shares, many times the average trading day volume for STLD common stock.



            

Coordonnées