The board of directors of Statoil has thoroughly reviewed and discussed the consultancy contract for business development in Iran, which has been the subject of media coverage. Taking the view that this agreement should not have been entered into, the board criticises the chief executive because the assessments which were made in this connection were not good enough.
The board has considered the chief executive's position and, based mainly on what is best for the group's interests, takes the view that he is still the person best suited to take Statoil forward. It is the board's opinion that Olav Fjell has shown decisiveness and has delivered good results during his four years as head of the group. He enjoys respect both within and outside Statoil. Chief executive Olav Fjell retains the confidence of the whole board of directors.
The board emphasises that the ambitions for Statoil's internationalisation will be upheld with high ethical standards. It is the opinion of the board that the group can succeed internationally without becoming involved in activities which are in a borderland as regards ethical norms and rules.
The administration has presented a plan of action to which the board has given its support. The board will closely follow up the following elements:
- external auditing of all existing contracts with advisers for international business development
- quarterly reporting to the board on the development of the existing as well as new contracts
- follow-up of political risk and ethical dilemmas associated with Statoil's involvement in countries with different sociopolitical systems
- improvement of training in ethics and handling ethical dilemmas
- strengthening the direct line of reporting from the internal auditor to the board
The board attaches importance to lending all possible assistance to the Norwegian National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime (Økokrim), and emphasises that complete clarification of this case is in Statoil's interests.
The chairman of the board has apologised to the directors for not immediately informing them collectively of this issue.
The board has taken note of this.