TORONTO, Dec. 31, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- McEwen Mining Inc. (NYSE: MUX) (TSX: MUX) is pleased to announce the highlights of a positive Feasibility Study (FS) for its 100%-owned Fenix Project, which is located in the State of Sinaloa, Mexico.
“The Fenix Feasibilty Study envisions a 9.5-year mine life with an attractive after-tax IRR of 28% using $1,500/oz gold and $17/oz silver. At current gold and silver prices, the project’s after-tax IRR almost doubles and the NPV more than triples versus the base case.
The project will incorporate an environmentally progressive method of tailings management, using inpit storage that creates multiple benefits, most importantly a secure containment of tailings enabling better reclamation results.
Average annual production is projected at 26,000(1) oz gold in Phase 1 and 4,200,000(4) oz silver equivalent in Phase 2. The critical path environmental permits are in hand for the first phase of production. Our next steps will involve detailed engineering, assessment of procurement options, and the evaluation of financing alternatives,” said Rob McEwen, Chairman and Chief Owner.
Fenix FS Highlights
| Base Case(1) $1,500/oz Gold, $17/oz Silver | Upside Case $1,900/oz Gold, $25/oz Silver | ||
| After-Tax IRR | 28% | 55% | |
| After-Tax NPV (8% discount) | $32 million | $98 million | |
| After-Tax Payback Period | 3.6 years | 2.8 years | |
| Average After-Tax Cash Flow per Year of Full Production | $12 million | $25 million | |
| The FS for project Fenix development involves two phases: | |||
| Phase 1: Years 1 to 6, Gold Production | |||
| |||
| Phase 2: Years 7 to 9.5, Silver Production | |||
| |||
Feasibility Study Report
The complete Fenix Project FS NI 43-101 Technical Report will be available on www.sedar.com and www.mcewenmining.com within 45 days. The FS was prepared by GR Engineering Services Limited (“GRES”) of Belmont, Western Australia, in accordance with the requirements of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 “Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects” (“NI 43-101”) and SEC Industry Guide 7.
Permits
The current operation at El Gallo Gold is a fully permitted site; permit for the Phase 1 was granted by the Federal Environmental Authority (SEMARNAT) in September 2019, for the addition of a mill and leach circuit in the location of the existing facilities for the reprocessing of the heap leach pad material. The permit amendment also includes the backfilling of a previously mined pit with mill tailings, as part of an integrated concurrent closure plan for the El Gallo Gold Mine.
Further project advancement for Phase 2 is subject to permit approvals. Phase 2 project permitting will require authorization to expand the process plant footprint at El Gallo Gold and the haul road, and to augment the tailings volume to be deposited at the depleted pit.
The Fenix Project has CONAGUA approval for the extraction of groundwater and land-use permits for the construction of wells required for the life of Fenix Project.
Resource Estimates
Estimated resources for the Fenix Project are comprised only of material within the boundaries of conceptual pit shells, except for the El Gallo heap leach pad, which is considered completely available for reprocessing.
For the purposes of mine scheduling, the contained gold ounces in the Heap Leach Material has been depleted from the resource model estimate defined by drilling by an amount of 23 koz Au, to account for the production from heap leach operations and gold in circuit assessments between the timing of the resource estimate up until December 2020.
Table 1: Fenix Project Resources Estimate(5)(6)
| Heap Leach Material(7) | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold | |||||
| Potential COG = 0 g/t Au | Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz | |||||
| Measured | 8.8 | 1.59 | 451 | 0.59 | 167 | |||||
| Indicated | 1.2 | 1.74 | 67 | 0.60 | 23 | |||||
| Measured and Indicated | 10.0 | 1.61 | 518 | 0.59 | 190 | |||||
| Inferred | 0.1 | 1.64 | 7 | 0.66 | 3 | |||||
| El Gallo Silver | ||||||||||
| In Optimized Pit Shell | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold | |||||
| Potential COG = 58 g/t Ag | Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz | |||||
| Measured | 1.0 | 155.38 | 4,791 | 0.08 | 3 | |||||
| Indicated | 3.5 | 126.55 | 14,228 | 0.13 | 15 | |||||
| Measured and Indicated | 4.5 | 132.76 | 19,019 | 0.12 | 18 | |||||
| Inferred | 0.1 | 128.92 | 286 | 0.14 | 0.3 | |||||
| COMBINED RESOURCES | ||||||||||
| In Optimized Pit Shells | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold | |||||
| Potential COGs variable | Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz | |||||
| Measured | 9.8 | 16.68 | 5,242 | 0.54 | 170 | |||||
| Indicated | 4.7 | 94.58 | 14,295 | 0.25 | 38 | |||||
| Measured and Indicated | 14.5 | 41.98 | 19,536 | 0.45 | 208 | |||||
| Inferred | 0.2 | 46.50 | 293 | 0.48 | 3 |
Table 2: Fenix Project Reserves Estimate(8)
| Heap Leach Material | Tonnes | Silver Grade | Silver | Gold Grade | Gold | |||||
| Mt | (g/t) | koz | (g/t) | koz | ||||||
| Proven | 8.8 | 1.59 | 451 | 0.59 | 167 | |||||
| Probable | 1.3 | 1.57 | 67 | 0.54 | 23 | |||||
| Proven + Probable | 10.1 | 1.58 | 517 | 0.58 | 190 | |||||
| El Gallo Silver | ||||||||||
| Proven | 0.7 | 165.71 | 3,708 | 0.05 | 1 | |||||
| Probable | 3.7 | 126.61 | 15,017 | 0.13 | 16 | |||||
| Proven + Probable | 4.4 | 132.82 | 18,725 | 0.12 | 17 | |||||
| COMBINED RESERVES | ||||||||||
| Proven | 9.5 | 13.60 | 4,159 | 0.55 | 168 | |||||
| Probable | 5.0 | 93.46 | 15,084 | 0.24 | 39 | |||||
| Proven + Probable | 14.5 | 41.19 | 19,243 | 0.44 | 207 |
Table 3: Assumptions for Heap Leach Pad and El Gallo Silver Pit Optimization Phase 2 (6)(9)
| Assumptions for In-Pit Resource Shells | Deposits | Values |
| Gold Price | All | $1,300/oz |
| Silver Price | All | $16.00/oz |
| Mining Cost | Heap Leach Pad | $0.53/t |
| El Gallo Silver | $12.06/t | |
Processing and G&A | Heap Leach Pad | $12.88/t |
| El Gallo Silver – Oxides | $26.90/t | |
| El Gallo Silver– Sulfides | $25.93/t | |
| Recovery - Au | Heap Leach Pad | 85.90% |
| El Gallo Silver | 79.40% | |
| Recovery - Ag | Heap Leach Pad | 45.0% |
| El Gallo Silver – Oxides | 82.5% | |
| El Gallo Silver– Sulfides | 88.1% | |
| Cut-Off Grade | Heap Leach Pad | 0 g/t Au |
| El Gallo Silver | 58 g/t Ag | |
| Inter-Ramp Pit Slope Angle | El Gallo Silver | 45 degrees |
FOOTNOTES
(1) The Base Case utilizes the three-year moving average prices for gold and silver (approximate value). Estimated 26,000 oz Au per annum production assumes full production from years 2023 to 2027. Average after-tax cash flow per annum from full production years 2023 to 2031 is approximately $12 million per annum. Average after-tax cash flows per annum for the period from start-up of production to closure (2022 to 2032) is approximately $8.6 million per annum. These cash flows assume the use of all eligible tax loss carry forwards from the El Gallo Gold Mine.
(2) Cash cost is calculated by dividing total life-of-mine production costs, general and administrative expenses and royalties by total ounces produced.
(3) All-in sustaining costs (AISC) are calculated by dividing the sum of all cash costs plus sustaining capital and reclamation costs by total ounces produced.
(4) All references to AgEq are based on an 88 Ag oz to 1 Au oz ratio. For Phase 1 silver accounts for <2% of total production. For Phase 2 gold accounts for approximately 9% of total production. Average annual AgEq production is from years 2028 to 2031.
(5) Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves. Numbers in the table have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate and may not sum due to rounding.
(6) Resources stated as contained within a potentially economically minable open pit; pit optimization parameters are, USD$1,300/oz Au, and USD$16.00/oz Ag. In-pit resource estimates have been developed based on gold and silver recoveries from both historical and recent testwork programs. Resource estimates are effective as of Oct 31, 2018. Resources are inclusive of reserves.
(7) The heap leach pad spent ore resource number assumes a cut-off grade that permits processing of the entire pad, whereas blocks within the leach pad model will be mobilized while mining, which will make them difficult to segregate; sub-cut-off leach pad material will inherently have potential acid generating sulfide liabilities if placed in our waste dumps and so it will be prudent to process the entire leach pad and place tailings in a previously mined pit at an overall environmental and economic benefit.
(8) The reserves stated here satisfy the requirements of the CIM Definition Standards, and the CIM Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines of November 2019, and have been converted only from those portions of the Mineral Resources that are classified as Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource categories after having been evaluated with consideration of all known modifying factors affecting economic viability.
(9) Cut-off grades vary by pit according to economic, recovery and metallurgical parameters.
The technical contents of this news release has been reviewed and approved by G. Peter Mah, P.Eng., COO of McEwen Mining and a Qualified Person as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects."
The technical information in this news release related to resource and reserve estimates has been reviewed and approved by Luke Willis, P.Geo., McEwen Mining’s Director of Resource Modelling and Qualified Person as defined by Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 "Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects."
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO US INVESTORS REGARDING RESOURCE ESTIMATION
McEwen Mining prepares its resource estimates in accordance with standards of the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum referred to in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101). These standards are different from the standards generally permitted in reports filed with the SEC. Under NI 43-101, McEwen Mining reports measured, indicated and inferred resources, measurements, which are generally not permitted in filings made with the SEC. The estimation of measured resources and indicated resources involve greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic feasibility than the estimation of proven and probable reserves. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of measured or indicated resources will ever be converted into economically mineable reserves. The estimation of inferred resources involves far greater uncertainty as to their existence and economic viability than the estimation of other categories of resources.
CAUTION CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements and information, including "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements and information expressed, as at the date of this news release, contain McEwen Mining Inc.'s (the "Company") estimates, forecasts, projections, expectations or beliefs as to future events and results. Forward-looking statements and information are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties, risks and contingencies, and there can be no assurance that such statements and information will prove to be accurate. Therefore, actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements and information. Risks and uncertainties that could cause results or future events to differ materially from current expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements and information include, but are not limited to, effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, fluctuations in the market price of precious metals, mining industry risks, political, economic, social and security risks associated with foreign operations, the ability of the corporation to receive or receive in a timely manner permits or other approvals required in connection with operations, risks associated with the construction of mining operations and commencement of production and the projected costs thereof, risks related to litigation, the state of the capital markets, environmental risks and hazards, uncertainty as to calculation of mineral resources and reserves, and other risks. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information included herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to reissue or update forward-looking statements or information as a result of new information or events after the date hereof except as may be required by law. See McEwen Mining's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the caption "Risk Factors", for additional information on risks, uncertainties and other factors relating to the forward-looking statements and information regarding the Company. All forward-looking statements and information made in this news release are qualified by this cautionary statement.
The NYSE and TSX have not reviewed and do not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of the contents of this news release, which has been prepared by management of McEwen Mining Inc.
ABOUT MCEWEN MINING
McEwen Mining is a diversified gold and silver producer and explorer focused in the Americas with operating mines in Nevada, Canada, Mexico and Argentina. It also owns a large copper deposit in Argentina.
| CONTACT INFORMATION: | ||
| Investor Relations: (866)-441-0690 Toll Free (647)-258-0395 Mihaela Iancu ext. 320 info@mcewenmining.com | Website: www.mcewenmining.com Facebook: facebook.com/mcewenmining Facebook: facebook.com/mcewenrob Twitter: twitter.com/mcewenmining Twitter: twitter.com/robmcewenmux Instagram: instagram.com/mcewenmining | 150 King Street West Suite 2800, P.O. Box 24 Toronto, ON, Canada M5H 1J9 |